JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 29, 2004

T-391 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Maria Edilma Cuartas Lopez Vs. Aquantioquia S.A. E Liquidacion

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Mesadas Pensionales. Pension Sancion. Deficit Presupuestal. Hecho Superado. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Minimo Vital Del Pensionado
  • Presunción de afectación por ausencia prolongada en pago de mesadas
Empresa En Liquidacion
  • Pago oportuno de mesadas pensionales
Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de mesadas pensionales
Derecho Al Minimo Vital
  • Definición
  • Requisitos para acreditar vulneración
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida el quince (15) de septiembre de dos mil tres (2003) por la Sala Cuarta de Decisión Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Medellín, dentro de la acción de tutela instaurada por la señora María Edilma Cuartas López contra Aquantioquia S.A. E.S.P en Liquidación
  2. Segundo. En su lugar, DECLARAR la carencia actual de objeto en la presente acción de tutela.
  3. Tercero. LÍBRESE por secretaría la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.