JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 3, 1993

T-368 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Jorge Bejarano

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Sentencias. Cosa Juzgada. Vias De Hecho. Derecho De Propiedad. Damnificados De Popayan. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la providencia del 1o. de abril de 1993 proferida por la Sala de Casación Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, y DECLARAR IMPROCEDENTE la acción de tutela reclamada por el peticionario en virtud del Principio de Cosa Juzgada, que para el caso opera plenamente.
  2. SEGUNDO. Líbrense las comunicaciones a las que se refiere el art. 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.