JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 14, 1998

T-350 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Manuel Caleb Miranda Avendaño

✓
Topic · hard data
Via De Hecho. Suspension En El Ejercicio De La Profesion De Abogado Con Desconocimiento Del Debido Proceso. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Principio De Tipicidad En Materia Sancionadora
  • Sin justa causa descuide o abandone el asunto encargado
Debido Proceso Disciplinario
  • Existencia de facultad expresa para abogado de desistir que no ocasionó perjuicio alguno
5 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de la Sección Tercera de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado, proferida el 22 de enero de 1.998, que otorgó el amparo al derecho al debido proceso invocado por el señor Manuel Caleb Miranda Avendaño, en el proceso de la referencia y anuló las decisiones de las Salas Disciplinarias de los Consejos Seccional del Magdalena y Superior de la Judicatura, dictadas dentro del proceso disciplinario adelantado en su contra.
  2. Segundo. LIBRESE por Secretaría la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines allí establecidos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.