JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 24, 2003

T-320 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Julio Cesar Calderon Orozco Vs. Iss Medellin

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud Reconocimiento Y Pago Pension De Vejez. Bono Pensional Tipo A. Cuota Parte. Regimen De Ahorro Individual. Hecho Superado. Proteccion S.A. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Pension De Vejez
  • Definición
  • Reconocimiento
Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado
  • Procedencia respecto a espera prolongada en reconocimiento de pensión o emisión del bono pensional
Bono Pensional
  • No emisión no es obstáculo para obtener pensión de jubilación
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Laboral del Circuito de Medellín, el 25 de octubre de 2002, y en consecuencia, y conforme a lo expuesto en la parte motiva respecto de los hechos, declarar que ya no tiene objeto la presente tutela a los derechos fundamentales de Julio César Calderón Orozco.
  3. SEGUNDO. Para los efectos del artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el juzgado de origen hará las notificaciones y tomará las medidas conducentes para el cumplimiento de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.