JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 18, 2002

T-277 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Rosa Otilia Hinestroza Vs. Registrador Del Estado Civil De Toledo Norte De Santander

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A Tener Un Nombre Y Una Nacionalidad De Menor De Edad. Reconocimiento Personalidad Juridica. Solicitud Inscripcion Con Apellidos Maternos. Desarrollo Legal Del Registro Civil De Nacimiento. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Personalidad Juridica Del Niño
  • Desconocimiento por no inscripción en el registro civil
Acción De Tutela
  • No es el mecanismo idóneo para lograr registro civil de menor
Derecho Al Reconocimiento De La Personalidad Juridica
  • Vulneración por expedición de registro civil
Presuncion De Paternidad
  • Carácter legal
  • Fundamento en la ley civil
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia proferida el dia veintisiete (27) de agosto de 2001 por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Toledo.
  2. Segundo. PREVENIR a la demandante, Rosa Otilia Hinestroza, para que proceda a registrar a su hijo Dumar Andrey con el primer apellido de su esposo, seguido del
  3. primero. de la madre, tal y como lo ordena el articulo 53 del Decreto 1260 de 1970 -modificado por el articulo 1deg de la Ley 54 de 1989-, si aun no lo ha hecho.
  4. LIBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.