JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 9, 2001

T-270 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Gloria Esther Galan De Santana Vs. Gobernador Del Magdalena Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida E Igualdad De Docente. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Salarios. Hecho Superado. Inclusion En La Nomina Del Situado Fiscal. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
  • Hecho superado por pago de acreencias laborales
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR por las razones expuestas, la sentencia del 15 de agosto de 2000 proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Penal del Circuito de Santa Marta.
  3. Segundo. LIBRENSE por Secretaría, las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.