JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 19, 2002

T-206 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Vilma Infante Aguilar Vs. Caja Popular Cooperativa

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Trabajo Y Minimo Vital. Estabilidad Reforzada De Mujer Embarazada. Contrato Individual De Trabajo A Termino Fijo. Principio De Buena Fe. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Transitoria De Mujer Embarazada
  • Casos excepcionales de procedencia para reintegro
  • Elementos fácticos que deben demostrarse para el reintegro
Mujer Embarazada En Contrato A Termino Fijo
  • Expiración del término fue la razón objetiva de terminación
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta sentencia el fallo proferido el 14 de agosto de 2001 por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial con sede en Santa Rosa de Viterbo, por medio de la cual se negó el amparo a la Señora Vilma Infante Aguilar, debido a que sus "derechos fundamentales constitucionalmente protegidos" no habían sido "amenazados ni vulnerados con el actuar de la Caja Popular Cooperativa."
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, líbrense las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.