T-1296 de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz
✓Claimant Eduardo Obando Mahecha Vs. Ministerio De Hacienda Y Credito Publico Y Otro.
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Reconocimiento no sujeto a disponibilidad presupuestal
- Apropiación para el pago no debe implicar alteración turno de entrega
- Cambio de legislación no justifica trato diferencial
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia de fecha 31 de marzo del 2.000 proferida por el Juzgado Doce Civil del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá, que, a su vez revocó la providencia de 18 de febrero del 2.000 dictada por el Juzgado Treinta y Cuatro Civil Municipal de Santafé de Bogotá dentro de la acción de tutela promovida por el ciudadano Eduardo Obando Mahecha contra El Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público y la Dirección Ejecutiva Seccional de Administración Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá- Cundinamarca.
- Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1.991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.