JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 1, 2001

T-1150 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Asuncion Rodriguez Rincon Vs. Sera Q.A. S.A. Tunja·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Vida Igualdad Salud Saneamiento Ambiental Propiedad Y Debido Proceso. Restablecimiento Servicio Suspendido De Agua. Contrato De Condiciones Uniformes Para La Prestacion De Servicios Publicos Domiciliarios. Pago Tres Ultimos Meses Facturados.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Empresa De Servicios Publicos Domiciliarios
  • Trámite para suspensión de servicio de agua
  • Orden de restablecimiento de servicio de agua
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Pago de servicio de agua por trámite de proceso ordinario
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia proferida el 20 de junio de 2000 por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Civil del Circuito de Tunja para restablecer la garantia constitucional del debido proceso del senor Asuncion Rodriguez Rincon. En consecuencia, oficiese a la empresa accionada, para que de proceder nuevamente a la suspension del servicio de acueducto que debe prestar al inmueble ubicado en la Avenida Oriental numero 9a-04, se cina estrictamente a los dictados de la Ley 142 de 1994.
  3. Segundo. Ordenar a la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion el envio de las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.