JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 30, 2003

T-1026 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Jose Ismael Ladino Rojas Vs. Tribunal Superior De Bogota

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso. Via De Hecho. Declaracion Nulidad Absoluta De Contrato De Promesa De Compraventa De Inmueble. Tradicion De La Cosa. Proceso Ejecutivo. Autonomia Del Juez. Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Ley 153 De 1887. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inmueble Objeto De Compraventa
  • No se consignaron los linderos generales del predio
  • No se determinó el bien en forma legal
Via De Hecho
  • Clases de defectos en la actuación
  • Defecto fáctico
  • Inexistencia por cuanto la decisión adoptada se basó en fundamentos razonables y objetivos
Acción De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales
  • Procedencia excepcional por vía de hecho
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. CONFIRMAR las sentencias proferidas por las Salas de Casacion Civil y Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, el 12 de mayo y el 17 de junio de 2003, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. Librense por Secretaria, las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.