T-1020 de 2003
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño
✓Claimant Pablo Emilio Pineda Casas Vs. Monica Rocio Jaime Alvarez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Subsidiariedad
- Improcedencia por interponerse por estudiante de consultorio jurídico
- Informalidad
- Inmediatez
- Representación para interponerla cuando no se ejerce directamente
- Se requiere título de abogado y poder para actuar
- Alcance
- No puede actuar como apoderado dentro de acciones de tutela
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas en este fallo, las sentencias proferidas por los juzgados 30 Civil Municipal y 40 Civil del Circuito, ambos de Bogotá, D. C., que denegaron el amparo incoado por Pablo Emilio Pineda Casas, en nombre de Claudia Janet Martínez Vargas.
- Segundo. Por Secretaría, LÍBRESE la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines allí contemplados.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.