JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 25, 2000

T-052 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Felix Arturo Murillo Sanchez

✓
Topic · hard data
Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Cooperativa De Trabajadores Asociados Mineros De Zaragoza (Antioquia). Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Primero. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia del 7 de abril de 1999 por medio de la cual el juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Zaragoza denegó la tutela impetrada por Félix Arturo Murillo Sánchez, pero REVOCARLA en el sentido de conceder la tutela impetrada con el fin de cancelen los salarios dejados de percibir.
  4. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Cooperativa de Trabajo Asociado, Mineros de Zaragoza, "Coomizar" que, en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la notificación de esta providencia, cancele, si aún no lo ha hecho, los salarios adeudados al señor Félix Arturo Murillo Sánchez y, además, continúe cumpliendo puntualmente las obligaciones derivadas de la relación laboral.
  5. Tercero. DESE cumplimiento a lo previsto por el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.