JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 1, 1993

T-043 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Ciro Angarita Baron

✓Claimant Carmenza Charry

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Arrendamiento Local Comercial (Florencia-Caqueta). Concedida
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (8 points)
  1. 1. REVOCAR la providencia del Tribunal Superior de Florencia del catorce (14) de Septiembre de 1992 .
  2. 2. En su lugar, ORDENAR al Juzgado
  3. Primero. Civil Promiscuo de Puerto Rico -Caquetá- asumir el conocimiento del proceso de restitución de local comercial instaurado por la peticionaria, señora Carmenza Charry contra Fernando Osorio Guzmán.
  4. 3. ORDENAR a la Procuraduría Delegada competente, investigar la conducta omisiva de los jueces
  5. Primero. Promiscuo Civil del Circuito de Puerto Rico y
  6. Segundo. Promiscuo Municipal de San Vicente del Caguán, en mencionado proceso.
  7. 4. ORDENAR que por Secretaria General se remita copia de esta sentencia a la Procuraduría General de la Nación para lo de su cargo.
  8. 5. ORDENAR que por Secretaria General se comunique esta providencia al Tribunal Civil del Distrito de Florencia -Caquetá-, en la forma y para los efectos previstos en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.