JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 30, 1997

T-037 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Luis Gustavo Valencia Lopez

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Sustitucion Pensional. Cajanal. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Contenido de la decisión
  • Pronta resolución
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  4. Tercero. Civil Municipal de Bogotá, el diez (10) de octubre de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996), mediante la cual se denegó la tutela impetrada por el señor LUIS GUSTAVO VALENCIA LOPEZ.
  5. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela del derecho fundamental de petición. En consecuencia, se ordena a la Subdirección de Prestaciones Económicas de la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social que, si todavía no lo hecho, proceda a resolver la solicitud de reconocimiento de la sustitución pensional presentada por el señor LUIS GUSTAVO VALENCIA LOPEZ, dentro del improrrogable término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificación de esta sentencia.
  6. Tercero. COMUNICAR esta providencia al Juzgado
  7. Tercero. Civil Municipal de Bogotá, para los efectos contemplados en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.