JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 8, 2000Full bench

C-665 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Simon Castro Benitez

✓
Topic · hard data
Prestacion De Servicios Publicos De Salud Por Empresas Sociales Del Estado
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

9 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 10/90.

Art. 19.

Ley 100/93.

Art. 192 parc. 195 nos- 3 y 4 y 197..

Estructura adtiva basica de las entidades de salud.

Directores de hospitales.

Exeq.

E inexeq.

Ver c-408/94

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 10/90. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 19Ley 10/90 «numeral 1»UPHELD
Art. 192Ley 100/93STRUCK DOWN· phrase
Phrase struck down«"definidas mediante reglamento del Gobierno Nacional", pertenecientes a su inciso primero, que se declaran INEXEQUIBLES.»
Art. 195Ley 100/93UPHELD
Art. 197Ley 100/93UPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLES el numeral 1 del artículo 19 de la Ley 10 de 1990 y los apartes demandados del artículo 192 de la Ley 100 de 1993, con excepción de las expresiones "definidas mediante reglamento del Gobierno Nacional", pertenecientes a su inciso primero, que se declaran INEXEQUIBLES.
  2. Segundo. Respecto de la demanda incoada contra los numerales 3º y 4º del artículo 195 y en lo referente a la impugnación del artículo 197 de la Ley 100 de 1993, ESTESE A LO RESUELTO por esta Corte en Sentencia C-408 del 15 de septiembre de 1994.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.