JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 15, 1997Full bench

C-521 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Juan Manuel Arango Velez

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 12/32. Art. 7. Ley 1/82. Art. 6. Dec. 1222/86. Art. 203. Impuesto Sobre Loterias Y Juegos De Apuesta. Exequibles E Inhibitoria.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impuesto De Propiedad De Entidades Territoriales
  • Prohibición legal de conceder exenciones o tratamientos preferenciales
Autonomia Legislativa En Materia Tributaria
  • Le corresponde indicar actividades y materias gravadas
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 12/32. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 7Ley 12/32 «Numeral 2.»UPHELD
Art. 6Ley 1/82UPHELD
Art. 203Decreto 1222/86UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. Decláranse EXEQUIBLES, en el entendido de que se refieren a las entidades territoriales que hoy contempla el artículo 286 de la Constitución, los artículos 6 de la Ley 1 de 1982 y 203 del Decreto 1222 de 1986.
  2. Segundo. Decláranse EXEQUIBLES las expresiones "los Municipios no podrán gravar las loterías y los premios en ninguna forma", pertenecientes al artículo 7, numeral 2, de la Ley 12 de 1932.
  3. Tercero. Por carencia actual de objeto, INHIBESE la Corte de resolver sobre las expresiones "Este impuesto no afectará los impuestos departamentales ya establecidos o que se establezcan en virtud de las autorizaciones legales vigentes", que hacen parte del artículo 7, numeral 2, de la Ley 12 de 1932.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.