JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 4, 1993Full bench

C-503 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Claudio Borrero

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 78/86. Art. 1 Parcial. Denominacion De Alcalde Mayor. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 78/86. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Ley 78/86 «inciso 3»UPHELD
On the entire provisionActo_legislativo 01/86STRUCK DOWN
On the entire provisionActo_legislativo 01/86STRUCK DOWN
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia, el inciso
  4. tercero. del articulo 1o. de la ley 78 de 1986 que preve: "Los Alcaldes de distrito, de capitales de departamento, se denominaran Alcaldes Mayores", con excepcion de la expresion "de capitales de departamento" que se declara INEXEQUIBLE. En consecuencia, es entendido que dicha denominacion solo corresponde a los alcaldes de Santafe de Bogota, Cartagena de Indias y Santa Marta.
  5. SEGUNDO. INHIBIRSE de fallar en el fondo en relacion con la pretension de nulidad, por presunta inconstitucionalidad de los actos administrativos proferidos por el senor alcalde municipal de la ciudad de Santiago de Cali, con fundamento en la norma antes citada.
  6. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
DissentJosé Gregorio Hernández GalindoDissentJorge Arango MejíaDissentVladimiro Naranjo Mesa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.