JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 27, 1998Full bench

C-255 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carmenza Isaza de Goméz

✓Claimant Nasiris Cabarcas Lara Y Otras

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 222/95. Arts. 143 Y 144. Medidas Cautelares. Vigencia De Embargo Y Secuestro. Decreto Practica Y Oposicion. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Proceso Concordatario
  • Constitucionalidad de embargo y secuestro
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 222/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 143Ley 222/95UPHELD
Art. 144Ley 222/95UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declaranse EXEQUIBLES, en relacion con los cargos estudiados, los articulos 143 y 144 de la ley 222 de 1995.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.