JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 26, 1998Full bench

C-252 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carmenza Isaza de Goméz

✓Claimant Alonso Valencia Salazar

✓
Topic · hard data
C.C. Art. 2229. Se Confiere Al Mutuario La Posibilidad De Pagar Las Sumas Prestadas Aun Antes Del Vencimiento Del Termino. Creditos Hipotecarios. Pago Anticipado. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Mutuo Con Intereses
  • Pago anticipado
  • Tope legal
Credito Para Vivienda A Largo Plazo
  • El prepago está permitido
  • Es regulado por normas de intervención del Estado
Teoria De La Imprevision
  • Incompetencia de la Corte Constitucional
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 84/73. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2229Ley 84/73UPHELD
Art. 2229Ley 57/87UPHELD
Art. 694Decreto 410/71 «cuya aplicación, además, debe estar sujeta a las consideraciones ...»UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Decláranse EXEQUIBLES, en los términos de esta sentencia, la expresión acusada del artículo 2229 del Código Civil, y el artículo 694 del Código de Comercio, cuya aplicación, además, debe estar sujeta a las consideraciones relacionadas con la intervención estatal para los créditos de vivienda.
  2. Es entendido que los intereses correspondientes no pueden estar en ningún caso por encima de los topes legales.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.