JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 15, 1997Full bench

C-231 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 323/96. Protocolo Modificatorio Del Acuerdo De Integracion Subregional Andino (Acuerdo De Cartagena) Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Comunitario
  • Derecho primario y secundario
  • Reducción o condicionamiento de competencias
Principio De Separacion De Poderes
  • Proceso de integración andino
Tribunal De Justicia Del Acuerdo De Cartagena
  • Nulidad de decisiones de la comunidad
  • Respeto de principios superiores
Acuerdo De Cartagena Y Protocolo Modificatorio
  • Transferencia de competencias soberanas
  • Tratado marco
Desarrollo Del Acuerdo De Cartagena
  • Respeto de principios superiores en decisiones comunitarias
Jurisdiccion Constitucional
  • Inaplicación interna decisión comunitaria en situación extrema
Ordenamiento Comunitario Andino
  • Aplicación de decisiones
13 topics · 13 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 323/96. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE, en los terminos de esta sentencia, el "Protocolo modificatorio del Acuerdo de Integracion Subregional Andino (Acuerdo de Cartagena)", suscrito en Trujillo, Peru, el 10 de marzo de 1996, y la Ley 323 de 1996 por medio de la cual se aprueba el protocolo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.