JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 13, 1998Full bench

C-197 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓
Topic · hard data
O.P. Art. 1 Del Proyecto De Ley N° 48/97 Senado Y 151-190/96 Camara Mediante Los Cuales Se Aclaran Los Art. 146 De La Ley 100/93 Y 1 De La Ley 332/96. Obj. Fundadas. Auto 035/98.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Ley Interpretativa
  • Contenido
  • No puede crear ley nueva y diferente
Objecion Presidencial
  • Improcedencia
  • Procedencia
Servidor Publico De Entidades Territoriales
  • régimen jubilatorio de transición
Pension De Empleados Publicos Del Orden Territorial
  • Regulación por iniciativa gubernativa
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 100/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 100/93STRUCK DOWN
On the entire provisionLey 332/96STRUCK DOWN
Art. 1Ley 48/97STRUCK DOWN
Art. 100Ley 48/97STRUCK DOWN
Art. 146Ley 48/97STRUCK DOWN
Art. 1993Ley 48/97STRUCK DOWN
Art. 1996Ley 48/97STRUCK DOWN
Art. 332Ley 48/97STRUCK DOWN
8 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Decláranse FUNDADAS las objeciones presidenciales formuladas por motivos de inconstitucionalidad en relación con el artículo 1 del proyecto de ley 48/97 Senado y 151-190/96 Cámara "Mediante la cual se aclaran los artículos 146 de la Ley 100 de 1993 y 1 de la Ley 332 de 1996", precepto que, por tanto, se declara INEXEQUIBLE.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentEduardo Cifuentes MuñozDissentAntonio Barrera Carbonell
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.