JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 6, 1998Full bench

C-192 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Jose Euripides Parra Parra Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 258/96. Art. 8 Parcial. Expropiacion De Inmueble Afectado A Vivienda Familiar. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Patrimonio De Familia
  • Indemnización por expropiación en dinero
  • Levantamiento judicial para hacer posible expropiación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 284/96. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 8Ley 258/96UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Sólo en los términos de esta Sentencia, decláranse EXEQUIBLES, en el artículo 8 de la Ley 258 de 1996, la frase "...y permitirá el levantamiento judicial de este gravamen para hacer posible la expropiación", y en el 4, numeral 2, de la Ley 284 de 1996, la expresión "Cuando la autoridad competente decrete la expropiación del inmueble...", en el entendido de que la indemnización correspondiente no puede pagarse a la familia mediante bonos o documentos de deuda pública, sino en dinero, por igual valor al del inmueble expropiado, en su totalidad y de manera previa a cualquier acto que pretenda hacer efectiva la expropiación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.