JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 28, 1998Full bench

C-155 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Claudia Blum De Barberi Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 397/97 Total Por Vicios De Forma Y Arts 33 Y 34. Creacion Del Ministerio De La Cultura. Ders. De Autor Y Participacion En Regalias. Exequibles Salvo Expresion Del Art. 34.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derechos De Autor
  • Son renunciables
  • Inalienables
  • Naturaleza
  • Son irrenunciables
Proyecto De Ley
  • Exceso de interpelaciones
  • Votación nominal
  • Debates
  • Votación en bloque
Ministerio De Cultura
  • Trámite constitucional
8 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 397/97. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 33Ley 397/97UPHELD
Art. 34Ley 397/97UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la Ley 397 de 1997, en cuanto a la forma de su expedicion y unicamente en relacion con los cargos considerados en la presente Sentencia.
  2. Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLE articulo 33 de la Ley 397 de 1997, en el entendido de que los derechos patrimoniales de autor se pueden ceder o enajenar libremente, siempre y cuando la cesion o enajenacion no afecte el derecho irrenunciable a la seguridad social de sus titulares.
  3. Tercero. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE la expresion "irrenunciable" contenida el articulo 34 de la Ley 397 de 1997.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.