Constitutional review ruling (C)November 2, 2000Full bench

C-1492 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Alexander Diaz Umaña

✓

Topic · hard data

Codigo Civil. Art. 215. Ley 75 De 1968. Art. 6. Adulterio De La Mujer. Presuncion De Paternidad Natural. Declaracion Judicial. Impugnacion. Prueba Antropoheredobiologica. Lesion Del Derecho A La Intimidad De Mujer Casada. Exequible.

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impugnacion De La Paternidad

Prueba antropoheredobiológica
Adulterio de la cónyuge
Prueba indiciaria y hechos conducentes
Establecimiento científico
No afectación de intimidad

Adulterio

Afectación de intimidad
Discriminación como causal para impugnar paternidad
Mecanismo desueto
Vulneración de igualdad

Derecho A La Intimidad De La Mujer

Acusación pública para establecer adulterio

Presuncion De Paternidad

Carácter general

4 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 84/73. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 215Ley 84/73UPHELD

Art. 215Ley 57/87UPHELD

Art. 6Ley 75/68DECLINED TO RULE

3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el artículo 215 del Código Civil.
Segundo. Declararse inhibida para resolver de mérito sobre el artículo 6 de la Ley 75 de 1968.

Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data

✓

Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓