JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 4, 2000Full bench

C-1345 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Luis Alejandro Motta M.

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 99 De 1993. Art. 28 (P.). Crea El Ministerio Del Medio Ambiente Se Reordena El Sector Publico Encargado De La Gestion Y Conservacion Del Medio Ambiente Y Los Recursos Naturales Renovables Se Organiza El Sistema Nacional Ambiental Sina. Reeleccion Y Designacion Director General. Exequible Expresion.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corporacion Autonoma Regional
  • Reelección del Director General
  • Finalidad
  • Funciones
  • Naturaleza jurídica
Participacion Ciudadana
  • Prohibición de reelección en cargo público
Poder Politico
  • Ciudadano en ejercicio
  • Elegir y ser elegido
  • Reelección en cargo público
Legislador
  • Reelección en cargo público
7 topics · 12 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 99/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 28Ley 99/93 «la expresión "siendo reelegible" del artículo 28 de la ley 99 de 1993»UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. DECLARAR EXEQUIBLE la expresión "siendo reelegible" del artículo 28 de la Ley 99 de 1993, "Por medio de la cual se crea el Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, se reordena el sector público encargado de la gestión y conservación del medio ambiente y los recursos naturales renovables, se organiza el Sistema Nacional Ambiental (SINA) y se dictan otras disposiciones."
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.