JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 22, 1995Full bench

C-267 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Jose Euripides Parra Parra

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 136/94. Art. 172 Inc. 1. Reeleccion De Personeros. Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 136/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 172Ley 136/94STRUCK DOWN· phrase
Phrase struck down«En ningún caso habrá reelección de los personeros.»
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. PRIMERO. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE la expresion "En ningun caso habra reeleccion de los personeros" del inciso
  4. primero. del articulo 172 de la Ley 136 de 1994 "por la cual se dictan normas tendientes a modernizar la organizacion y funcionamiento de los municipios".
  5. NOTIFIQUESE,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.