JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 4, 2000Full bench

C-1340 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Hernando Herrera Vergara Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 99 De 1993. Arts. 64 65 Y 66. Ministerio Del Medio Ambiente. Sistema Nacional Ambiental-Sina. Funciones De Las Entidades Territoriales Y La Planificacion Ambiental. Limitacion De La Cosa Juzgada Constitucional. Exequible Condicionado.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corporacion Autonoma Regional
  • Financiación con impuesto municipal
Departamento
  • Función ambiental
Impuesto Predial
  • Financiación de entidades ambientales
Ley Ordinaria
  • Desarrollo de competencias ambientales
  • Asignación, en principio, de funciones ambientales
Ley Organica
  • Distribución de competencias entre la Nación y entidades territoriales
  • Reserva
Medio Ambiente Sano
  • Reparto de competencias entre niveles del Gobierno
Municipio
  • Función ambiental
  • Porcentaje de tributo para la C.A.R.
  • Titularidad del impuesto sobre propiedad inmueble
7 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 99/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 64Ley 99/93UPHELD
Art. 65Ley 99/93UPHELD
Art. 66Ley 99/93UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLES los articulos 64, 65 y 66 de la Ley 99 de 1993, pero unicamente por los cargos estudiados en esta sentencia, de conformidad a lo senalado en los fundamentos 9o y 18 de la parte motiva.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.