C-129 de 2002
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
✓Claimant Jean Pierre Aguado Gomez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- No corrección de demanda respecto de normas que integrarían la proposición normativa
- Razones de argumentos que no son específicos, pertinentes y suficientes
- No corrección y presentación de cargos
- Alcance de los requisitos
- Requisitos mínimos
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 75 de 1968.
Art. 1 (p.).
Filiacion.
Crea el instituto colombiano de bienestar familiar.
Reconocimiento hijo natural y extramatrimonial.
Irrevocabilidad.
Impugnacion.
Familia conformada por union marital de hecho.
Acceso a la administracion de justicia
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 45/36. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE
- Declararse INHIBIDA para pronunciarse sobre la constitucionalidad o inconstitucionalidad de la expresion "irrevocable" del articulo 1 de la Ley 75 de 1968, por ineptitud sustancial de la demanda.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.