JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 21, 1996Full bench

C-113 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant William Bucheli Burbano

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 100/80. Art. 267. C.P. Ley 81/93. Art. 2 Parcial. Delitos Que Requieren Querella. Cosa Juzgada. Exequibles. Ver <a Href=../1995/C-459-95.Rtf> C-459/95</A>.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 100/80. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 33Decreto 2700/91ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 2Ley 81/93UPHELD
Art. 33Ley 81/93UPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. PRIMERO. ESTARSE A LO DECIDIDO en la sentencia No. C-459 del doce (12) de octubre de 1995, que declaró EXEQUIBLE el artículo 33 del decreto 2700 de 1991, modificado por el artículo 2 de la ley 81 de 1993, "siempre que se entienda que los delitos que allí se enuncian y que se cometan contra menores, no quedan sujetos, como condición de procesabilidad, a la formulación de la respectiva querella".
  4. SEGUNDO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el artículo 267 del Decreto 100 de 1980, siempre que se entienda que dicha disposición no se aplica cuando en los delitos a los que se refiere, aparezca como sujeto pasivo un menor.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.