JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 24, 2001Full bench

C-1106 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Carlos Fernando Muñoz Castrillon Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Jornada Ordinaria Diurna De Trabajo. Complemento En Horario Nocturno Para Empleados Públicos
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Control De Constitucionalidad
  • Interpretación de normas legales
Corte Constitucional
  • Interpretación de normas legales
Jornada Ordinaria Diurna De Trabajo
  • No terminación se completa con una hora nocturna
  • Complemento con una hora de trabajo nocturna
  • Complemento en horario nocturno para empleados públicos
  • Complemento en horario nocturno por concesión de permisos
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Cargo concreto
  • Requisitos mínimos
7 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 1042 de 1978.

Art. 34 inc. 3.

Jornada ordinaria nocturna de empleados publicos.

Recargo salarial.

Proteccion especial al trabajo.

Principio de igualdad.

Ineptitud de la demanda.

Exequible.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1042/78. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 34Decreto 1042/78UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el inciso
  2. tercero. del artículo 34 del Decreto Ley 1042 de 1978.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.