JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 27, 1993Full bench

C-093 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Eduardo Umaña Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 2271/91. Normas De Orden Publico Adoptadas Como Legislacion Permanente. Jueces Sin Rostro. Recompensas. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2271/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 3Decreto 2271/91UPHELD
Art. 4Decreto 2271/91UPHELD
Art. 5Decreto 2271/91UPHELD
Art. 6Decreto 2271/91UPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. administrando justicia en nombre del pueblo y por autoridad de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Declarar Exequibles los articulos Tercero, Cuarto,
  4. Quinto. y
  5. Sexto. del Decreto 2271 de 1991 que incorporan como legislacion permanente disposiciones de los decretos legislativo 2790 de 1990, 099 de 1991, 390 de 1991 y 1676 de 1991; en las partes demandadas y en la forma como aparecen transcritos en el apartado II de esta sentencia y bajo las consideraciones en ella contenidas.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
DissentAlejandro Martínez CaballeroConcurrenceEduardo Cifuentes MuñozDissentCiro Angarita Baron
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.