JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)January 31, 2001Full bench

C-091 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez

✓
Topic · hard data
Control De Constitucionalidad Del Convenio De Recuperacion De Bienes Culturales Robados Con Ecuador
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Bienes Culturales
  • Recuperación y devolución por hurto
  • Comercio ilícito
  • Exhibición por Estados
Patrimonio Cultural
  • Protección por Estados
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 587 de 2000.

Convenio entre colombia y el ecuador para la recuperacion y devolucion de bienes culturales robados.

Exequibles.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 587/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la Ley 587 de 2000 "por medio de la cual se aprueba el Convenio entre las Republicas de Colombia y del Ecuador para la recuperacion y devolucion de bienes culturales robados, firmado en Bogota, D.C., el 17 de diciembre de 1996".
  2. Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el Convenio entre las Republicas de Colombia y del Ecuador para la recuperacion y devolucion de bienes culturales robados, firmado en Bogota, D.C., el 17 de diciembre de 1996.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.