JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 20, 1997Full bench

C-077 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 2150/95. Arts. 4041424344 Y 45 143 Y 144. Supresion De Reconocimiento De Personerias Y Licencias De Funcionamiento. Exeq. Ver <a Href=../1996/C-395-96.Rtf> C-395/96</A>.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Entidad Cooperativa
  • Inspección y vigilancia por el Gobierno
  • Supresión de trámites para constitución
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Supresión reconocimiento de personerías jurídicas
Facultades Extraordinarias Para Reformar Legislacion
  • No afectación estructura de códigos
Legislador
  • Alcance de la inspección y vigilancia por el gobierno
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2150/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 143Decreto 2150/95UPHELD
Art. 40Decreto 2150/95ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 41Decreto 2150/95ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 42Decreto 2150/95ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 43Decreto 2150/95ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 44Decreto 2150/95ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 45Decreto 2150/95ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
7 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. En relacion con los articulos 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 y 45, estese a lo resuelto por la sentencia C-395 del 22 de agosto de 1996.
  2. Segundo. Declaranse exequibles los articulos 143 y 144 del Decreto 2150 de 1995.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.