JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 23, 2005

T-977 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Oscar Jose Noguera Cuello Vs. Ministerio De La Protección Social - Grupo De Trabajo Para La Gestion Del Pasivo Social De La Empresa Puertos De Colombia

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Requisitos de la respuesta
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho de petición al trabajo la salud la vida y al minimo vital de persona de la tercera edad a quien no le han resuelto una solicitud de reconocimiento de la pension de vejez no habiéndose vencido el plazo para el efecto.

Requisitos de las respuestas a peticiones en materia de derechos pensionales.

Terminos para resolver solicitudes de reconocimiento de derechos pensionales.

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla el 23 de mayo de 2003 y por la Sala de Casación Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, el 3 de agosto de 2005, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta sentencia.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría General, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.