JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 20, 2002

T-784 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Ligia Agudelo Romero Y Otros Vs. Alcaldia Mayor De Bogora

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Servidores Publicos De La Personeria. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Aumento Salarial Ante Omision En La Actualizacion Del Salario. Mantenimiento Del Poder Adquisitivo Real. Reitera <a Href=../2002/Su1052-02.Rtf> Su.1052/02</A>. Neg
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Transitoria
  • Improcedencia incremento salarial para servidores públicos
Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
Gobierno
  • Formulación anual del presupuesto y ley de apropiaciones
Juez De Tutela
  • Imposibilidad de modificar presupuesto para incremento salarial de servidores públicos
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Confirmar la sentencia de mayo 17 de 2002 proferida por el Juzgado 51 Penal del Circuito de Bogota en el proceso T-605882, y la sentencia de febrero 26 de 2002 proferida el Juez 37 Penal del Circuito de Bogota en el proceso T-597336.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.