JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 7, 1999

T-750 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Edgar Eduardo Mejia Restrepo

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Principio No Reformatio In Pejus. Hurto Agravado. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Principio No Reformatio In Pejus
  • Características
  • Protección
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Risaralda, el 3 de agosto de 1999.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela interpuesta por el señor Edgar Eduardo Mejía Restrepo, por violación del artículo 31 de la Constitución Política, en virtud de haber sido empeorada su situación como apelante único por parte del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Pereira, mediante providencia del 30 de junio de mil novecientos noventa y nueve.
  3. Tercero. ENVIESE copia de la presente providencia al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Pereira, Sala de Decisión Penal, para los efectos procesales pertinentes.
  4. Cuarto. Líbrense por Secretaría, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.