JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 5, 1999

T-739 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Laura Garcia De Peñuela

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Al Minimo Vital. Devolucion De Ahorros En La Caja Cooperativa De Ahorro Y Credito Social. Cooperamos. Inexistencia De Perjuicio Irremediable. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Entidad Bancaria
  • Procedencia por prestación de servicio público
Caja Cooperativa De Ahorro Y Credito Social
  • Inexistencia de intervención que permitía renegociación de títulos
  • Prestación de servicio público
  • Prórroga y renegociación de certificados de depósito a término no afecta mínimo vital ni constituye perjuicio irremediable
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Incumplimiento de obligación contractual por Cooperativa
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia, el fallo proferido el 31 de mayo de 1999 por el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Penal del Circuito de Ibagué, que denegó la tutela interpuesta por la señora LAURA GARCIA DE PEÑUELA contra la Cooperativa de Ahorro y Crédito Social - COOPERAMOS -.
  3. Segundo. LIBRAR por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.