JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 16, 2000

T-709 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Neira Offir Salazar Castañeda

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Y A La Vida. Pago De Una Suma Igual Al Salario Minimo Legal Vigente A Persona De La Tercera Edad. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Minimo Vital De Persona En Estado De Debilidad Manifiesta
  • Afectación por congelación transitoria de recursos de institución financiera
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido el dia 24 de noviembre de 1999 por el Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Cali, en su lugar, los derechos fundamentales al minimo vital y a la vida de la senora Neira Offir Salazar Castaneda.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR al Liquidador de la Cooperativa Financiera COOEMSAVAL que, tan pronto como los recursos de la liquidacion lo permitan, pero en forma prevalente a los pagos que se deban hacer a los demas acreedores, y con cargo a su CDAT, cancele a la senora Neira Offir Salazar Castaneda, durante los primeros cinco (5) dias de cada periodo mensual, el pago de una suma igual al salario minimo legal vigente a tiempo de este, sin perjuicio de que le sean reintegrados, en concurrencia con los demas acreedores y de conformidad con las normas legales que regulan los procesos liquidatorios, sumas adicionales imputables a su acreencia.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.