JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 10, 1996

T-712 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Candido Rivas Mosquera

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Al Trabajo En Condiciones Dignas Y Justas. Reubicacion De Docente. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derechos Del Educando
  • Deberes de autoridades y docentes
Docente
  • Carga académica
Juez De Tutela
  • Incompetencia para reasignar carga académica
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Istmina de fecha 24 de julio de 1996, mediante la cual se revoco la sentencia del Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Condoto del 27 de mayo de 1996, que habia concedido la tutela impetrada.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Alcalde Municipal de Condoto proceda a solucionar el problema suscitado con motivo de la vinculacion del docente Candido Rivas Mosquera al Liceo Municipal Academico de Bachillerato Nocturno "Neftali Lozano Osorio", bien reubicandolo en otro plantel educativo, o si lo estima conveniente suprimiendo el cargo, todo ello con arreglo a las formalidades legales. Igualmente se advierte a dicha autoridad, que la conducta observada por el referido docente eventualmente puede ser constitutiva de faltas disciplinarias que ameritan el tramite del correspondiente proceso disciplinario.
  3. Tercero. COMUNICAR, a traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, el contenido de la presente sentencia al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Condoto, con el fin de que proceda a dar cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el art. 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.