T-677 de 2003
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería
✓Claimant Enrique Rodriguez Velandia Vs. Corte Suprema De Justicia
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Obligación de dar trámite a la acción de tutela y de resolver mediante sentencia
- El ordenado por el artículo 143 de la ley 100 de 1993 no significa pago efectivo de dinero
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (3 points)
- Primero. DECLARAR que es contrario a la constitucion que la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en este caso su Sala de Casacion Penal, rechace las solicitudes de amparo alegando que la accion de tutela no es procedente contra providencias judiciales, puesto que esa no es una de las causales previstas en el articulo 17 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
- Segundo. DENEGAR la accion de tutela presentada por Enrique Rodriguez Velandia, por las razones expresadas en esta providencia.
- Tercero. LIBRENSE por Secretaria General las Comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli previstos.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.