JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 31, 1999

T-637 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Ana Isabel Fajardo Ortiz

✓
Topic · hard data
Salarios A Secuestrado.Solicitud De Pago De Salarios A Hija De Sargento Secuestrado Por Las Farc. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Secuestro
  • Protección transitoria de pago de salarios en beneficio de hijo menor
  • Pago de salarios previa existencia de plena prueba
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del juzgado
  2. primero. penal municipal de Chiquinquira y, en su lugar, conceder la tutela como mecanismo transitorio, en los terminos de esta sentencia.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR al Ejercito Nacional que, en el termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion de esta providencia proceda a efectuar el pago del 50% de los salarios a que tiene derecho el sargento Pedro Jose Guarnizo Ovalle.
  4. Tercero. La demandante debera, en el termino de cuatro (4) meses contados a partir de la notificacion de la presente sentencia, iniciar los tramites necesarios para declarar ausente, por secuestro, al Sargento Pedro Jose Guarnizo Ovalle. En caso de incumplimiento, cesaran los efectos de la presente sentencia.
  5. Cuarto. Librense por Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.