JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 19, 1996

T-623 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Miryam Angarita Rincon

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Intimidad. Reserva De Historia Clinica. Matrimonio Civil Ante Notario. Oposicion Por Ligadura De Trompas. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Notario
  • Categoría
Derecho A La Intimidad Personal Y Familiar
  • Suministro de información reservada
Vida Privada
  • Protección
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expresadas, la sentencia del cinco (5) de junio de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996), proferida por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de El Cocuy, que concedió la tutela solicitada por la señora Miryam Angarita Rincón.
  2. Segundo. Por las razones explicadas, ordenar al Notario Único de El Cocuy, que, si aún no se ha realizado, y las partes están de acuerdo, continúe el trámite para que se celebre el matrimonio civil solicitado. Para este efecto, el notario deberá proceder dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de esta sentencia.
  3. Tercero. COMUNICAR esta decisión al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de El Cocuy, Boyacá, para que sean notificadas las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.