JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 12, 1995

T-605 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Juan Carlos Coronell Vargas

✓
Topic · hard data
Improcedencia De La Tutela Para Suspender Los Efectos De Un Contrato. Codiscos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Indefension
  • Inexistencia en contrato de exclusividad musical
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Contrato de exclusividad musical
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia general sobre controversias contractuales
Demanda De Tutela
  • Prolongación de contrato con codiscos
Subordinacion
  • Contrato entre particulares
  • Inexistencia en contrato de exclusividad musical
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de fecha 10 de julio de 1995 de la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Medellin, por medio de la cual se confirmo el fallo del 31 de mayo del mismo ano, proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Civil del Circuito Especializado de la misma ciudad, que nego la tutela interpuesta por Juan Carlos Coronell Vargas contra la empresa "CODISCOS S.A."
  3. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR la presente decision al Juzgado
  4. Segundo. Civil del Circuito Especializado de Medellin, con el fin de que proceda a dar cumplimiento a lo dispuesto por el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.