JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 1, 2004

T-554 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Miguel Angel Jimenez Rodriguez Vs. Ministerio De Hacienda Y Credito Publico Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Anticipo De Cesantias Parciales Reconocidas Para Cancelar Credito Hipotecario. Deficit Presupuestal. No Falta Capacidad Economica. Fondo De Prestaciones Sociales Del Magisterio. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia pago de cesantías
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Del Trabajador
  • No afectación por no pago de cesantías
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida el cuatro (4) de diciembre de dos mil tres (2003) por la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, que confirmo la denegacion de la tutela solicitada, dentro de la accion instaurada por el senor Miguel Angel Jimenez Rodriguez contra el Ministerio de Hacienda y Credito Publico y el Ministerio de Educacion Nacional- Fondo Nacional de Prestaciones Sociales del Magisterio
  2. Segundo. LIBRESE por secretaria la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.