JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 6, 2005

T-466 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jose Manuel Jaimes Quintero Vs. Iss

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Capacidad Economica De Persona Que Requiere Medicamento
  • Conforme al salario que devenga puede sufragarlo
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la salud y la vida de afiliado a quien el medico le formulo medicamentos no pos que la entidad se niega a suministrar mientras no sea estudiado por el comité técnico científico.

Solicita se ordene la entrega de los medicamentos formulados.

Derecho a la salud y la vida en condiciones dignas.

Exclusión de ciertos tratamientos y medicamentos de la cobertura del pos.

La accion de tutela es procedente para la protección a los derechos a la salud y a la seguridad social cuando la vulneración de los mismos afecta derechos fundamentales como la vida la dignidad y la integridad personal.

No se encontro probado el requisito de la incapacidad economica.

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar la decisión proferida por la Sala Civil Familia Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Valledupar en el proceso de Acción de tutela de José Manuel Jaimes Quintero contra el Seguro Social Seccional Cesar, por los motivos expuestos en el transcurso de ésta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.