JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 13, 2008

T-456 de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Jose Agustin Suarez Alba·Respondent La Nacion-Ministerio De Defensa -Ejercito Nacional

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Reglas jurisprudenciales
Derecho De Peticion Ante Ministerio De Defensa
  • Cobija una repuesta de fondo pero no una resolución favorable de lo pedido
Derecho De Petición
  • Alcance y contenido
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho de peticion y acceso a la administracion de justicia presuntamente vulnerados por la accionada al no responder de fondo las solicitudes del actor dirigidas a obtener la liquidacion y el pago de sus prestaciones sociales.

Derecho fundamental a efectuar peticiones y recibir una respuesta clara, oportuna, coherente y completa.

Reiteracion jurisprudencial.

No obstante las respuestas dadas por la accionada no resolvieron favorablemente sus pretensiones, si se atendio a su peticion, se emitio un pronunciamiento de fondo y, por ende, se garantizo su derecho.

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de tutela proferido por la Seccion Quinta de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado el dia veintiseis (26) de octubre de 2007, en virtud del cual se NIEGA el amparo solicitado.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria LIBRESE la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.