JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 7, 1992

T-444 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Jackeline Campos

✓
Topic · hard data
Habeas Data. Derecho A La Intimidad. Derecho Al Buen Nombre. Banco De Datos. Reunion Del E.L.N. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del Juzgado 29 Superior de Santafe de Bogota, con las aclaraciones aqui formuladas.
  2. Segundo. Comuniquese el contenido de esta sentencia a la Fiscalia General de la Nacion, al Departamento Administrativo de Seguridad y a la Direccion General de la Policia Nacional.
  3. Tercero.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.