JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 2, 1992

T-440 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Lucila Diaz

✓
Topic · hard data
Libertad De Enseñanza. Educacion Sexual. Personal Docente. Negada. Se Modifico Sentencia Del Tribunal Y Ordena Reabrir Invest. Disciplinaria.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Tunja, del 11 de febrero de 1992 en el sentido de denegar la tutela solicitada por la señora LUCILA DIAZ DIAZ.
  3. SEGUNDO. MODIFICAR la sentencia mencionada, en el sentido de solicitar al Ministro de Educación que por su conducto se disponga la reapertura de la investigación disciplinaria abierta contra la señora LUCILA DIAZ DIAZ para los propósitos señalados en el fundamento jurídico 12.
  4. TERCERO. SOLICITAR al Ministro de Educación que, en un término de 12 meses luego de recibir el informe de los expertos mencionado en este proveído, proceda a ordenar las modificaciones y cambios a que haya lugar para adelantar, conforme a los mismos, la educación sexual de los educandos en los diferentes centros educativos del país.
  5. CUARTO. LIBRESE comunicación al mencionado Tribunal con miras a que se surta la notificación de esta providencia, según lo establecido en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.