JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 6, 2004

T-414 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Mario De Jesus Vergara Ramirez Vs. Iss

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Mesadas Pensionales. Pension De Invalidez. Accidente De Trabajo No Profesional. Periodo Minimo De Cotizacion. Debilidad Manifiesta. Llamado A Prevencion. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia para el pago de pensión de invalidez
  • Procedencia excepcional para el pago de mesadas pensionales atrasadas
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Del Pensionado
  • Presunción de afectación por ausencia prolongada en pago de mesadas
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido el veintiseis (26) de noviembre de dos mil tres (2003) por el Juez
  2. Quinto. Civil del Circuito de Medellin.
  3. Segundo. TUTELAR los derechos constitucionales fundamentales de Mario de Jesus Vergara Ramirez y en consecuencia ORDENAR al Instituto de Seguros Sociales Seccional Antioquia que, si todavia no lo ha hecho, en el termino de quince (15) dias contados a partir de la notificacion de la presente providencia, proceda a cancelar todas mesadas que adeuda al accionante.
  4. Se le previene igualmente, a fin de que realice las gestiones necesarias y adopte los mecanismos legales pertinentes para no continuar incurriendo en omisiones como la aqui probada, que ponen en riesgo los derechos fundamentales del demandante.
  5. Tercero. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.