JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 8, 1992

T-408 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Pedro Jose Monsalve

✓
Topic · hard data
Libertad De Escoger Profesion. Derecho Al Trabajo. Medicina Homeopatica. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia proferida por el Juez Veinte (20) Penal del Circuito de Medellín el veintidos (22) de enero de mil novecientos noventa y dos (1992), por medio de la cual, a su vez, se confirmó la del Juzgado Cuarenta y Uno (41) Penal Municipal de Medellín del 12 de diciembre de 1991, relativa a la acción de tutela instaurada por el señor PEDRO JOSE MONSALVE LEON.
  4. Segundo. Por la Secretaría líbrense las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.